<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush&#8217;s Broken Ruby Slippers</title>
	<link>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/</link>
	<description>commentary on the world around us, with an effort to keep paranoia at the lowest healthy level</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-469</link>
		<author>david</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-469</guid>
		<description>I just found this fascinating comment on Slashdot regarding a similar head-in-the-stand stance to Science in 1960's Russia.  Could the same thing happen here?

[quoted material follows]

Back in the 1970's, there was a USSR scientist who had weird biological theories that really hindered work done in that country by real biologists..
 
You're thinking of Trofim Lysenko who wasn't a trained scientist, but his 'theories' seemed to fit in with Communist dogma - so he attracted the approval of Stalin. Lysenko got his ideas from a Russian form of Lamarckism known as Michurianism. Essentially it was the old falsehood that said such nonsense as the children of a giraffe have longer necks because their parents stretched to reach leaves on trees. 

Lysenko came to prominence in 1948 when he declared Mendelist evolution to be reactionary, decadant and its proponents to be enemies of the Soviets. Other scientists knew what that meant and on whose behalf he was speaking (Uncle Joe) and quickly fell behind the Party line. He and his theories basically held sway in the Eastern Bloc until 1965 when Kruschev had Lysenko denounced and returned the Soviet Union to the orthodox view of evolution. 

But of course Lysenko's theories were in sway during the pivotal discoveries of DNA and how it affected genetics. So the Soviet Union fell behind at a vital moment and never recovered. 

It's an extreme form of the current situation in the US, where any old nonsense can be promoted by politicians to keep their vested interests (be they oil, lead or Christian fundamentalism) happy. Sadly the same is starting to happen over here in the UK, where our non-scientific Prime Minister refuses to condemn schools that teach creationism over evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found this fascinating comment on Slashdot regarding a similar head-in-the-stand stance to Science in 1960&#8217;s Russia.  Could the same thing happen here?</p>
<p>[quoted material follows]</p>
<p>Back in the 1970&#8217;s, there was a USSR scientist who had weird biological theories that really hindered work done in that country by real biologists..</p>
<p>You&#8217;re thinking of Trofim Lysenko who wasn&#8217;t a trained scientist, but his &#8216;theories&#8217; seemed to fit in with Communist dogma - so he attracted the approval of Stalin. Lysenko got his ideas from a Russian form of Lamarckism known as Michurianism. Essentially it was the old falsehood that said such nonsense as the children of a giraffe have longer necks because their parents stretched to reach leaves on trees. </p>
<p>Lysenko came to prominence in 1948 when he declared Mendelist evolution to be reactionary, decadant and its proponents to be enemies of the Soviets. Other scientists knew what that meant and on whose behalf he was speaking (Uncle Joe) and quickly fell behind the Party line. He and his theories basically held sway in the Eastern Bloc until 1965 when Kruschev had Lysenko denounced and returned the Soviet Union to the orthodox view of evolution. </p>
<p>But of course Lysenko&#8217;s theories were in sway during the pivotal discoveries of DNA and how it affected genetics. So the Soviet Union fell behind at a vital moment and never recovered. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s an extreme form of the current situation in the US, where any old nonsense can be promoted by politicians to keep their vested interests (be they oil, lead or Christian fundamentalism) happy. Sadly the same is starting to happen over here in the UK, where our non-scientific Prime Minister refuses to condemn schools that teach creationism over evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-470</link>
		<author>david</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Today's International Herald Tribune also takes up this issue of growing Lysenkoism. [link]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s International Herald Tribune also takes up this issue of growing Lysenkoism. [link]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-471</link>
		<author>jay</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-471</guid>
		<description>"Creeping Lysenkoism" would sound even, well, creepier. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Creeping Lysenkoism&#8221; would sound even, well, creepier. <img src='http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley Parish</title>
		<link>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-472</link>
		<author>Wesley Parish</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-472</guid>
		<description>It seems you've got a pincer movement in the States - an Administration without any interest in objective truth on one hand, and on the other, a set of fanatical businesspeople desiring to wrap the world up and present it to themselves via something called "Intellectual Property".

And in the middle, you've got the unfortunates who try to operate the machine.  While both sides are having a go at them.

I expect the United States will become one big retirement villa in a matter of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems you&#8217;ve got a pincer movement in the States - an Administration without any interest in objective truth on one hand, and on the other, a set of fanatical businesspeople desiring to wrap the world up and present it to themselves via something called &#8220;Intellectual Property&#8221;.</p>
<p>And in the middle, you&#8217;ve got the unfortunates who try to operate the machine.  While both sides are having a go at them.</p>
<p>I expect the United States will become one big retirement villa in a matter of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-473</link>
		<author>Gary</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-473</guid>
		<description>I haven't read a report lately, but I suspect that the &#34;service sector&#34; is still where the bulk of future jobs in the U.S. are likely to be created; so, yeah, soon we'll have most of the population running around at minimum wages to serve the non-productive rich&#8212;the good olde days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read a report lately, but I suspect that the &quot;service sector&quot; is still where the bulk of future jobs in the U.S. are likely to be created; so, yeah, soon we&#8217;ll have most of the population running around at minimum wages to serve the non-productive rich&mdash;the good olde days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-474</link>
		<author>Gary</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-474</guid>
		<description>I haven't read a report lately, but I suspect that the &#34;service sector&#34; is still where the bulk of future jobs in the U.S. are likely to be created; so, yeah, soon we'll have most of the population running around at minimum wages to serve the non-productive rich&#8212;the good olde days. (Actually, I sxpect that revolution would come up pretty quickly, unless television is free.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read a report lately, but I suspect that the &quot;service sector&quot; is still where the bulk of future jobs in the U.S. are likely to be created; so, yeah, soon we&#8217;ll have most of the population running around at minimum wages to serve the non-productive rich&mdash;the good olde days. (Actually, I sxpect that revolution would come up pretty quickly, unless television is free.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-475</link>
		<author>Gary</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>I haven't read a report lately, but I suspect that the &#34;service sector&#34; is still where the bulk of future jobs in the U.S. are likely to be created; so, yeah, soon we'll have most of the population running around at minimum wages to serve the non-productive rich&#8212;the good olde days. (Actually, I expect that revolution would come up pretty quickly, unless television is free.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read a report lately, but I suspect that the &quot;service sector&quot; is still where the bulk of future jobs in the U.S. are likely to be created; so, yeah, soon we&#8217;ll have most of the population running around at minimum wages to serve the non-productive rich&mdash;the good olde days. (Actually, I expect that revolution would come up pretty quickly, unless television is free.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-476</link>
		<author>Gary</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-476</guid>
		<description>Ah, I wondered what would happen if I went back to the previous page and edited my comment... Sorry about that, David.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I wondered what would happen if I went back to the previous page and edited my comment&#8230; Sorry about that, David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulette</title>
		<link>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-477</link>
		<author>paulette</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nonfamous.com/wp/2004/02/19/bushs-broken-ruby-slippers/#comment-477</guid>
		<description>Ah, and now the Bush administration responds to the UCS report, with all the depth of analysis and persuasive reasoning we've come to expect from W's white house.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, and now the Bush administration responds to the UCS report, with all the depth of analysis and persuasive reasoning we&#8217;ve come to expect from W&#8217;s white house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
